[RRE]Scientific Societies on WIPOwriting

rreauto-importedrre-post
1998-09-14 · 4 min read · Edit on Pyrite

Source

Automatically imported from: http://commons.somewhere.com:80/rre/1998/RRE.Scientific.Societies.html

Content

This web service brought to you by Somewhere.Com, LLC.

[RRE]Scientific Societies on WIPO

``` ---

This message was forwarded through the Red Rock Eater News Service (RRE). Send any replies to the original author, listed in the From: field below. You are welcome to send the message along to others but please do not use the "redirect" command. For information on RRE, including instructions for (un)subscribing, see http://dlis.gseis.ucla.edu/people/pagre/rre.html or send a message to requests@lists.gseis.ucla.edu with Subject: info rre

---

Date: Thu, 17 Sep 1998 12:02:46 -0400 From: Lauren Gelman

[...]

American Association for the Advancement of Science American Association for Artificial Intelligence American Mathematical Society American Statistical Association Association for Computing Machinery Computer Research Association Institute for Electronics and Electrical Engineers--USA

Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics

September 14, 1998

Senator Orrin G. Hatch Chairman Senate Judiciary Committee 224 Dirksen Building Washington, D.C. 20510

Dear Chairman Hatch,

As presidents of leading U.S. science and engineering societies, we are writing to you regarding H.R. 2281, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. We are particularly concerned that the database and the anti-circumvention provisions of the Act will have substantial negative impacts on the conduct of basic research. They also will slow the progress of important technology developments, and reduce beneficial economic returns of research and development to society. Indeed, several of the undersigned organizations have submitted specific legislative proposals to improve H.R. 2281.

The science and technical communities are dependent on the fair use privilege for research, teaching, and development. They traditionally have made data and information derived from publicly funded research available with minimal restrictions and for no more than the cost of reproduction and dissemination. Unfortunately, the fair use provision in Title V of H.R. 2281, the section that applies to databases, will create many obstacles for our communities.

Databases that are time dependent, such as telescope readings, are impossible to replicate. Others, such as the human genome sequence data, are costly and impractical to duplicate. There is even concern that the "potential uses" restriction could prohibit the use of statistical or other analytic techniques on protected data, especially if a resulting statistical product has commercial value. Such a prohibition could seriously damage U.S. science, engineering, and financial analysis, as well as data product innovation.

On July 10, 1998, the presidents of the three national academies sent the enclosed letter in which they express "serious concern" about the proposed legislation. Many of the reasons for their concern remain in Title V. Any legislation that does not retain the traditional fair use privileges under which scientists always have operated will have a chilling effect on science.

The proposed database provisions also could harm U.S. industry. Quoting from "Bits of Power," a report issued by the National Research Council in 1997:

"... [S]uch an approach ignores the contribution of basic science to the ability of U.S. firms to predominate in markets for technology and information goods. Despite a general consensus on the need for sustained levels of investment in research and development, the proposed database laws could change the status quo without anyone's wanting it to happen by elevating the price of the one raw material to which U.S. researchers have always had ready access. If less available scientific information were to translate to fewer applications of economic importance, the end result would be a loss of U.S. technological competitiveness in an integrated world market."

While we understand the desire to protect investments made in large data collections, the proposed legislation fails to recognize the legitimate needs of academic, professional, scientific, and ordinary users of data.

A second major flaw in H.R. 2281 involves the anti-circumvention provisions. Since many of the techniques that are used to break into systems are also used to test system security, the legislation would outlaw devices and technologies that are crucial for making information processing systems trustworthy and secure. By attempting to regulate technologies rather than infringing behavior, progress of research in cryptography and other computer security areas could be significantly hindered.

Although the bill includes limited exceptions on circumvention (Title I Sec. 1203) for encryption research, the majority of computer security research does not involve encryption. Leading computer security researchers fear that the legislation may criminalize not only their research, but even the teaching of many of the standard security techniques. (See the enclosed letter.) Similarly, the bill's exemption to permit reverse engineering for the sole purpose of interoperability may criminalize development of software engineering tools and technology with other uses, such as fixing Year 2000 problems in software. The consequences are potentially catastrophic.

A bill with sections entitled "Permissible Acts of Encryption Research" or even "Permissible Acts of Security Research" is too cumbersome for the scientific research community. Scientists should not be required to consult lawyers to determine if their previously legitimate research might be in violation of the law. Furthermore, because it is impossible to anticipate the direction and nature of all research, the approach of exempting scientific research is fundamentally flawed.

We believe that H.R. 2281 would prohibit bona fide forms of science and technology research that benefit us all, and we urge you to reconsider the approach used in H.R. 2281. We would welcome the opportunity to work with you on a version of the bill that preserves the freedom of American scientific research and does not threaten our long term economic security.

Sincerely,

Dr. M.R.C. Greenwood, President, American Association for the Advancement of Science

Dr. David L. Waltz, President, American Association of Artificial Intelligence

Dr. Arthur Jaffe, President, American Mathematical Society

Dr. David S. Moore, President, American Statistical Association

Dr. Barbara Simons, President, Association for Computing Machinery

Dr. Ed Lazowska, President, Computer Research Association

Dr. John Guckenheimer, President, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics

Dr. John R. Reinert, President, Institute for Electronics and Electrical Engineers-USA

cc: Senate Judiciary Committee Senate Commerce Committee Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott Senate Minority Leader Thomas Daschle ```

This web service brought to you by Somewhere.Com, LLC.