Thinking Processesconcept

problem-solvinglogic-toolscause-and-effect
1 min read · Edit on Pyrite

The Thinking Processes (TP) are a suite of logical analysis tools that eliyahu-goldratt developed in the early 1990s as TOC's most general problem-solving framework. Goldratt considered the Thinking Processes his most important contribution — more so than any specific operational method — because they provide a rigorous methodology for identifying what to change, what to change to, and how to cause the change, applicable to any complex system.

The toolkit comprises five primary tools:

  • Current Reality Tree (CRT): Maps cause-and-effect relationships from observed undesirable effects (UDEs) back to one or a few root causes. See current-reality-tree.
  • Evaporating Cloud (EC): Surfaces and challenges hidden assumptions behind persistent conflicts. See evaporating-cloud.
  • Future Reality Tree (FRT): Tests proposed solutions (injections) by mapping their logical consequences forward. See future-reality-tree.
  • Prerequisite Tree (PRT): Identifies obstacles to implementing a solution and the intermediate objectives needed to overcome them. See prerequisite-tree.
  • Transition Tree (TT): Provides step-by-step action plans, linking each action to its rationale. See transition-tree.
  • The TPs were developed during the thinking-processes-development era and first made widely accessible through its-not-luck (1994), where they appeared in narrative form. h-william-dettmer and lisa-scheinkopf each produced systematic technical treatments that formalized the rules of TP construction, making them teachable without Goldratt's presence.

    The launch-of-satellite-program in the mid-1990s was substantially devoted to teaching the TPs to a global practitioner base. The TPs embody Goldratt's conviction — articulated most fully in the-choice — that inherent-simplicity means complex problems yield to rigorous cause-and-effect reasoning, and that apparent dilemmas are almost always the product of flawed assumptions rather than genuine trade-offs.